Text

The brilliance of “Louie”

image

“…But you do it. And you do it because we love it more than anything else.”

[Note: I also published this on Medium! Feedback welcome.]

They say that all comedy comes from a dark place.

I’m a big fan of Marc Maron’s “WTF” podcast. It’s a hugely entertaining interview show where Maron monologues, is incredibly self-referential (and self-critical), and interviews people from all walks of life. Usually he interviews comics. Sometimes it’s big star comics like Chris Rock or Michael Keaton. Other times it’s musicians. More than anything, it’s a show about the craft - it’s about the hard work, it’s about the sacrifice, and it’s about being put on the planet to do one thing - the thing that you’re good at, either because you’re good at it or you feel compelled to do it or both.

And it’s about the darkness that comes from your craft.

So it’s with a lot of excitement that I’m writing this review of “Louie” the show. Louis C.K., the titular character of his self-produced and self-written show, is not a comic that I’m familiar with. He’s been positively received by people from all walks of life. He’s also got a lot of positive press recently for eschewing the evil Ticketmaster for his shows’ ticket distribution.

They say that like attracts like, and that the ones you admire tend to like the same things you do. So that’s why, after all the accolades from my comedy heroes Maron and Conan O’Brien, I decided to give “Louie” a spin. The final straw was when I listened to a Slate review of Maron’s new show where the consensus was “‘Maron’ is fine, but ‘Louie’ and ‘Curb’ did it better.” The few clips I saw of the show, coupled with C.K.’s reputation as a blue collar worker in the comedy community, compelled me to start watching.

I’m glad I did. This is a stellar series.

A friend warned me that “Louie” would be a series of moments, some taking longer to build up than others. It would be sketch comedy, but in a show format. I trust his taste - he did introduce me to the excellent “Arrested Development,” after all. So I had my reservations about “Louie” going in.

After watching a full season of the show, I’d have to respectfully disagree with his sentiment. Because each episode is so lean - clocking in at less than 30 minutes - there is no repercussion associated with hour long shows. Build-ups are usually paid off, and each episode has a clear theme. Moreover, the monologues shot in the comedy clubs, interspersed between scenes in each episode, really give an idea as to C.K.’s formidable standup skills. More importantly, they provide the necessary tie-in between his life and his craft.

Many subjects are covered here. Fatherhood, dating, Catholic guilt, manhood, family, homosexuality, the meaning of life - C.K. alternates between heart-felt topics and dirty, raunchy comedy. And he does it in a hardworking, earnest fashion that demonstrates his dedication to his craft.

Although the plot of the show is loosely autobiographical, it often borders on the absurd. I don’t know how, but C.K. pulls off the right balance of the realistic and the whimsical. And by golly, it’s really dark when it works.

I’m inclined to believe that comedy is what happens when you can’t help but laugh at the absurdities of life. “Louie” is not just for the comedy intelligentsia, but it’s not stupid either. It’s not high brow comedy, but you have to work a little to “get” it.

Since we are describing the nature of his comedy, I do feel compelled to comment on some of the borderline offensive jokes that C.K. performs in the standup segments. I am fine with it because I don’t feel that it’s coming from a place of malice. The politically incorrect material doesn’t detract from the overall experience.

Even in an episode where C.K. “attacks” a heckler who can’t stop talking during his show, you understand why the attack is happening. C.K. goes to great depths to explain why he is doing it in a post-show scene. Some may view the construction of this episode as disingenuous, but I think it sheds a bit of light on what it means to be an insecure comic.

More than anything, the show’s tightly-constructed-yet-willing-to-go-places narrative shows the level of excruciating effort that goes into making each episode. Louis C.K. has said that the reason for his success was that he worked harder than just about anybody else and that he paid his dues. I can believe it.

Let’s talk about two episodes that stood out for me.

The Catholic episode. As someone raised Catholic, I understand a bit about C.K.’s childhood and where he’s coming from. There are a few scenes where the fear of God is used as a force to keep the children in line. The ol’ “scare-em-so-they-respect-authority” tactic.

The lesson that is taught to C.K. and his classmates is outrageous. My emotional reaction transitioned from laughter to disgust to “WTF” and back to hope. I was impressed that the scene, with its sinister buildup and soft landing, made me feel all these emotions. Heady stuff indeed.

The aftermath scene, where Louie’s mom gives him the Religion Talk, is great. It’s one of those poignant moments where as a parent, you just talk to your child straight-up, with no pretense, because you love them.

The “party” episode. The episode where C.K. is “forced” to go into the night and party. To break out of his shell and to go into a hyper-real, funny yet sad place all at the same time.

There are some great sequences shot in a night club where the show becomes a silent film, because C.K. chooses not to reveal the dialogue and you just read off the body language of the club goers. The show deliberately forgoes the dialogue to show the energy of the scene and how distant we, as a proxy for C.K.’s character, are from the action. There is a sense that he is lost; that things are murky and unclear.

At the end of the night, C.K. decides to visit a club for a quick standup session. He starts off tentative, but quickly gains steam and the inattentive crowd begins to laugh at his jokes. As he talks about the two things he’s good at - fatherhood and masturbation - you understand that this is a man who enjoys his craft because it’s something that compels him. He feels a need to stand in front of strangers and spills his beans - and he’d rather do that than try to get laid or pretend he’s somebody else. He does it because it’s all he’s good at. And that’s beautiful.

As an introvert, I can identify with the “I’ve got nowhere to go and I just want to stay home” mentality. It’s also an interesting character development episode because you realize how comfortable C.K. is in his own skin. At 42 years of age he accepts who he is.

Not to mention - the hyper-manic babysitter in the episode was great. Not sure if that says something about babysiters in general, or just the difficulty of finding quality babysitters in NYC at 2 in the morning.

The effect of this show is that it’s making me more eager to see Louis C.K. live someday. And that’s the power of social media - allowing someone like me, who knew nothing of this man, to become a fan.

Here’s to the craft of comedy, to hard work and doing something that affects people around the world.

Here’s to the joy and laughter. Here’s to the darkness.

Text

Make it so - a fan’s review of Star Trek Into Darkness

image

My crew is my family, Kirk. Is there anything you would not do for your family?

One thing I’ve learned over the years is that it’s always good to go into a film with low expectations.

Examples I come back to, time and time again:

  • Kill Bill Vol. 1 - was self-hyping this to no end. Thought it was going to be QT’s greatest. Absorbed every single thing on the Internets. Result: disappointment.
  • Prometheus - tried hard to stay away from the hype. Couldn’t because the film released worldwide except in my little country (China). Read pages and pages of analysis before watching. Result: disappointment. (To be fair, the film would’ve been disappointing even if I came out of a cave to watch this.)

So this time, despite the fact that I had been a fan of Trek for 20-odd years, and know more about Tribbles and warp cores than I care to admit, I didn’t spoil anything for myself heading into J.J. Abrams’ latest.

Verdict? It was a satisfying step forward for the franchise.

It’s very hard to interpret Trek as a standalone anything - there is so much history and cultural context behind the voyages of the starship Enterprise. But the good thing about films is that the good ones work on different levels - in this case, for fans and non-fans.

I was explaining the film to my girlfriend while she was watching it with me, and I realized halfway through how much of a nerd I was. Explaining who the Vulcans were, the Prime Directive, the red shirt in-jokes, the nerve pinch, Starfleet, Klingons - it was all nice to know. But the story works on a basic level without these details because the characters were interesting and reasonably developed.

Kirk, Spock, Uhura, Chekhov, Sulu, Scotty, Bones - they all had their moments. It’s never easy to do a movie with an ensemble cast, but I felt that their one-liners and actions were consistent with who they were and the actors did the best with the material they had.

Which is why I appreciated the fact that the story worked as a pure dramatic and action piece. It’s tightly constructed and suspenseful, with enough “fan service” to make it work for the diehards.

Ultimately, the film is a buddy movie and the two leads - Pine and Quinto - create a strong buddy dynamic and foundation. Pine’s Kirk is a stoic man of action, while Quinto’s Spock is the logical and unexpectedly comedic anchor of the film. From the opening scene we get a strong sense of their dichotomy at work, and they keep the chemistry going throughout. They play off of each other quite well.

And the villain. I don’t want to spoil too much of it, but the reveal and nod to Trek’s illustrious history is awesome. I think what Benedict Cumberbatch (from the outstanding British series Sherlock) did with the role was solid. It’s certainly the best Trek cinematic villain we’ve had since First Contact’s Borg Queen. He’s menacing, threatening and nuanced - a challenging foil for Kirk and crew.

Certain plot points were quasi-cringeworthy, but the fanboy in me accepted them as forgivably weak areas of Trek in general. Examples: Kirk and Spock risking their lives on every away team mission (really?), Kirk beating the odds every single time (never tell me the odds!), Spock breaking away from character in the final scenes, and so forth. I can see how certain audiences can get frustrated, though (remember what I said about my low expectations?)

It’s impossible to view the film without viewing the allusions to the Iraq war, 9/11 and so forth. I think it was done fairly tastefully, so I didn’t have any issues with it. Your mileage may vary.

As for the controversial/gratuitous underwear shot - well, it really wasn’t that bad or unexpected, given Trek’s history. They didn’t give Carole Marcus much of anything to do in this film, save for a speech and prancing around in her underwear. Maybe they will set her up for a future re-appearance. Probably as Kirk’s romantic interest. Make that definitely.

Upon watching the film, I went back and read articles like this one. While it’s true that box office numbers are down, I’m generally optimistic about the future of the Trek franchise. At the very least, we have a mini-run of 2 solid films in a row and they’re reasonably good summer blockbusters.

I think it’s premature to re-boot a Trek TV series, because the heart and soul of what makes this work is the characterization. If we were to see another spin-off in the Trek universe it probably would not be well received, depending on the setting and cast. If I were the powers at Paramount, I’d tread carefully given the difficult climate of TV today.

So there you have it - my thoughts in a nutshell. Enjoyed it a lot despite the plot holes. Bromance was convincing and the fan service was…serviceable. Go see it - it’s worth the price of admission.

Peace,

James

 

Text

What I learned about product management at Yahoo

It’s been almost a year and a half since I started working as a product manager at Yahoo. During this time I learned a great deal about the product management discipline. I learned by observing and working with some extremely smart people, and by making mistakes along the way.

Here’s what I know so far.

Making good products is HARD. Let me repeat that again.

Making good products is HARD.

What do we know about good, possibly great, products? They’re easy to use. They’re sexy. They feel like butter. They just work. We may lack the words to describe them, but we know great products when we see them.

It’s engineering. It’s design. It’s attention to detail and hard work.

Every element of the product, from the loading screen to the transition animations to the subtle ways that you discover button A does both X and Y, happened by design. There are no happy accidents in software engineering - otherwise they’d be bugs.

What we don’t see and appreciate enough are the blood, sweat and tears that the teams went through to put it together. We don’t see designers go through countless iterations or engineers trying to squeeze every last drop of performance on that loading screen.

Making it look easy is HARD. Making it look hard is EASY.

Experience is king. I’m not just talking about consumer-facing products, either. There are so many varieties of products for different target audiences and markets. Some target internal developers. Some target a machine somewhere. There’s a time and place for each product.

Are you targeting users? Make the user experience great.

Are you targeting developers? Cater to their needs; make their jobs easy.

Are you targeting systems? Identify the interactions and think about the people behind the curtain.

At the end of the day it’s people that use products. And the less barriers you put up, the better. User experience, developer experience, system experience - it all matters.

Make the experience great, then keep it that way. Don’t lose sight of what’s important.

It’s all about the people. Good people make good products. Crappy people make crappy products. Period.

I used to work with a developer whose iOS code would always crash on every project he put his hands on. Other people had to intervene to patch his mistakes and oversights. It was madness.

When you work with someone skilled, you just know. They get stuff done with no bullshit and you trust them to execute. You don’t need to micromanage - they play their role and you play yours.

Great people are like great products - indispensable and hard to find.  

Why did Marissa Mayer acquire a bunch of mobile companies in such a short period of time? Why did she shut down their products? What did she have to gain?

She needed the people. She was acquiring the talent, not the products. Great people will make great products. Terrible people will always make terrible products. No exceptions.

Focus, focus, focus. The most successful product managers I’ve seen are the ones who possess a laser sharp focus and approach. This translates to everything they do.

Successful PMs know the parameters of the game they’re playing and more importantly, how to win the game. Every day they are advancing their chess pieces towards that goal.

Their dedicated focus translates down to every level of the product.

Great product managers don’t waste time doing things that aren’t useful or productive. Terrible product managers waste time doing things that nobody will care about in 6 months. Don’t be the sucker.

Be concise. It’s harmful to be long winded, whether it’s in an email, in a presentation or in a conversation.

Human attention spans and memories, by nature, are fickle and short. Don’t write a novel that no one will read.

The most successful product managers I’ve seen are the ones that get straight to the point. There’s a time and place for niceties; other times, you just need to focus and get stuff done.

In closing, there’s a lot that I need to learn about product management. These are simply my observations and I know that it’s going to take dedication and practice for me to get remotely good at half of these things.

What I do know, however, is that it’s going to be a fun and rewarding journey to get there.

Peace,

James

Text

The body is a fragile thing

I’m no athlete.

Why does it matter?  It means I don’t take great care of my body.  I don’t need 2% body fat or speed or the ability to 360 tomahawk slam.  I’m flatfooted, not-quite-coordinated and I’ve never gotten better in my half marathon times since I started running the damn things.

But you know what?  I’ve always thought I was immortal.

Or let me put it this way: I act like my body is 22 years old when I’m really in my thirties.

Case in point - THE INJURY.

Suffered a mild ankle sprain in April, didn’t wait for it to fully heal.  Didn’t ice it, didn’t bandage it, didn’t elevate the leg.  Went straight back to basketball after 1 week.

Lo and behold, 2 weeks later I sprain it again.  This time the INJURY is severe.  It always hurts more the second time.  In the same spot.

I can’t walk for a few days.  I can limp but that’s not the same.  I taxi to and from work when I return to the office.

That was smart, James.  Your team is up by 20 points in the second half.  You don’t need to play but you got greedy and wanted to stay on the court.  You’re playing a meaningless basketball game with the outcome decided.  And now you can’t walk.

That was then, this is now.  Now I can walk but I’m out of commission for a good while.  Been unable to play basketball for a few weeks now, actually.  I ran on the treadmill a few days ago for the first time.  The ankle felt fine for about 30 minutes, and then it was back to the stationary bike.  A tiny bit of exertion proved OK - but I’m not going to push it.

It’s great to think I’m immortal…until time and time again, facts show that I’m not.

My dislocated shoulder and battle scars agree with me.

Peace,

James

Text

Totally uninformed NBA Round 2 and 3 picks from yours truly

image

“I’m the real Superman!”

Predicting winners is hard.

My Round 1 predictions didn’t quite pan out.  Correctly picked 5 out of 8 victorious teams.  But I’m going to try again and invoke the magical 8 ball for Rounds 2 and 3.

Before we go there…what really surprised me in Round 1?  I can think of a few things.

MVP, thy name is Steph Curry.  Wait a second…there should be no reason Curry is THIS good, right?  The “Son of Dell” proved all the haters, including me, wrong.  I’m going to eat my hat now.

Dead man walking, Celtics edition.  Despite some signs of life, the Celtics proved that they’re past their mileage.  Time for Danny to rebuild.  The core is NOT coming back.  Moving on…

Lakers putting up a fight.  JUST KIDDING.  They did exactly what people expected - which is roll over and die.  Don’t let the door hit you on the way out, guys.  Superman lives…on the golf course.

Rose not coming back.  JUST KIDDING AGAIN!  It’s not worth it for D-Rose to come back this year.  Come back next year when you’re mentally ready.  Be 220% ready if need be.  Screw the haters.

(This Rose Round 1 highlight is priceless, however.  I’ll watch that all day.  All day.)

Here are my totally uninformed and biased Round 2 picks:

Round 2 - Eastern Conference

Indiana / New York

A few things stood out for me in Round 1.

Paul George and Roy Hibbert are straight up killin’ it.  There were games where Atlanta decided to show up and put a body on these guys, but their attempts were largely unsuccessful.  George isn’t shooting a good percentage, but he puts an inordinate amount of pressure on the defense. Hibbert is playing like a legitimate 7 footer, which is saying a lot for his career.

David West is one of those guys you never, ever want to meet in a back alley.  He’s got a boxer’s mentality, and it will be good to see West and Indiana turn up the aggression this series.  They’ll be more than a few bruised feelings in this series.

As for New York, Carmelo Anthony is in the prime of his career.  He’s going to get his, but hopefully more efficiently than these 26 points on 26 shots types of games.  His late 4th quarter disappearance in the clinching game against Boston was alarming, but he’s got the supporting cast to make it work.

(Is it fair to say that when James and Anthony entered the NBA at the same time, we never expected them to exhibit this level of greatness?  Yet despite Anthony’s MVP caliber season, he’s still leagues away from Lebron.  That says a lot about the King.  Long live the King!)

I was really surprised by how well Felton played, especially against Bradley.  He and the Knicks are shooting the ball with a lot of confidence.  They’re gelling at the right time.

Two or three times a game, you’re going to get the inexplicable J.R. Smith shot.  But for all the negatives, having a stone cold assassin like Smith on your roster is a net positive.  This is now the biggest stage of Smith’s career and I expect him to play well.

Full out war will erupt in this series, but in the end I think New York has enough weapons to come out ahead.

Prediction: New York in 7

Chicago / Miami

This was a troubling Round 1 for the Bulls.  The Nets took them to the brink.  If it weren’t for Nate’s offensive outbursts, the outcome would have been much different.

Nate’s the ultimate irrational confidence guy.  Never met a shot he didn’t like.  Shoots you in and out of games on his own.  Thibs seems to have a handle on him and Nate seems to be making the right plays.  Sometimes, though, we just have to roll the dice and hope to get lucky.  We NEED some more 30 point games from this man when the offense is sputtering.

There were times in the Bulls-Nets series where the basket looked tiny for the Nets.  With Boozer and Noah manning the middle, the make-able 2 foot shots started to miss, and all was right with the world.

Coming into the playoffs, we knew the Bulls would be in trouble if Noah wasn’t 100%.  Luckily, he played his way into form, culminating in a masterful 24-point, 14-rebound, 6-blocks (GEE WHIZ!), 2-assists Game 7 performance. Noah is truly the heart and soul of the team.

(Note to self - is there a player that is more exciting and fun to watch than Noah, with his passion and energy and “six-shooter” gesture after critical shots?  No sir.)

And Jimmy “Buckets” Butler…that’s my man crush right there.  He absolutely contained D-Will in Game 7.  The best part of Butler’s game is that he simply goes about his business.  No whining about missed calls, no sense of false entitlement, no lapses.  He’s too focused on the important things - and that’s shutting players down, driving fearlessly to the hoop and making the right plays.

So I’m writing a lot of gushing accolades for Chicago.  But they’re playing Miami.  The best team in the league.

I’m not a big enough homer to suggest that the Bulls can beat the Heat.  But they’ll give them enough of a challenge.  And they won’t be swept.

Let’s be honest here, folks - Lebron, Wade and Bosh and team look absolutely unstoppable right now.  They’re gonna rock.  And they’re gonna roll.

D-Rose…don’t come back this season.  Get well and try to gear up for a deep run next year.

Prediction: Miami in 6

Round 2 - Western Conference

San Antonio / Golden State

The Golden State Warriors proved a lot of things in Round 1.  They have fearless playmakers, they have a solid Bogut back in action, and they have Steph Curry.

How did this happen?  How did a team run by Jarrett Jack at the point make it to Round 2?

It doesn’t matter.  They beat an undermanned Nuggets team.  And the Spurs are a different ballgame.

The Spurs showed last year that they are capable of containing 3 point shooting teams.  And executing their offense in their relentless, signature fashion.  They WILL hurt you if you don’t rotate properly.

The Big Three looks good so far.  Parker has the advantage at the PG spot.  Ginobili will be lighting up Harrison Barnes and a couple other guys soon.  If San Antonio can get 35 good minutes a game from Manu and Timmy, the Spurs will be in good shape.

The question, though, is how competitive the series will be.  I’m prepared to give Golden State some credit here.  It will be San Antonio.  But it won’t be easy.

Prediction: San Antonio in 6

Oklahoma City / Memphis

If you’re a Thunder fan, you try to forget all the terrible coaching decisions (“hack-a-Turk,” playing Perkins at all, etc.) and mindless offensive/defensive lapses from the Zombie Sonics.  We knew they’d beat the Rockets, but man did they have to work.  It’s not that I expected them to coast, but now we know how much they missed Westbrook.

(To all the Westbrook critics…I told you so.  I told you so.  I TOLD YOU SO!!) 

Durant is tired.  He’s been seeing triple and quadruple teams.  He’s making the right pass.  More often than not, his teammates are knocking down shots.  Even old man Fisher.

But this Grizzlies team is one of the top defensive squads in the league.  They’re going to put a physical toll on Durant and they’re going to make OKC work.

Marc Gasol could be the best big man in the series.  Yes, I put him ahead of Ibaka.  Gasol is going to give the Thunder defense fits with his cartwheeling ways and zippy passes.  He’s an absolute wonder to watch.

And Zach Randolph.  He was non-existent 2 months ago and now he’s come alive.  And that’s big trouble.

I’m an optimist.  I think Scott Brooks will make the right adjustments.  And the Grizzlies play a more traditional type of offense in which Perkins’ play will actually be appreciated.  I think the Thunder will tighten up their defensive sets.

That’s a lot of IFs…

Nonetheless, this is going to be close.  And the Thunder have to take care of business at home or all bets are off.

I’ll give the Thunder the slight edge here.  It will take them 7 games.

Prediction: Oklahoma City in 7

—————————————————————————————

Round 3 - I’m going to write a more detailed breakdown when we get there.  For now, here’s my psychic powers at work.

Miami beats New York in 5

Oklahoma City beats San Antonio in 6

—————————————————————————————

Finals - I don’t think I need to write anything here.  Barring injuries to the Miami squad, they should be able to beat any team in the West.

Miami beats Oklahoma City in 5

—————————————————————————————

Peace,

James